@evm-effect/rlp
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@evm-effect/shared | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo workspace package; not directly imported is expected in this setup. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:ts-dedent | AI (phantom-deps): Declared dep used in config/test context; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:yup | AI (typosquat): Scoped package @evm-effect/rlp is not a typosquat of yup; Levenshtein match is spurious. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.14 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.13 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.8 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.5 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.4 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.3 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.1.1 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.1.0 | 4 / 3 |
v0.1.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: juliascript.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.