@fairyhunter13/opentui-core-linux-arm64
Prebuilt linux-arm64 binaries for @opentui/core
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): Prebuilt native binary package; libopentui.so is the intended artifact for this platform-specific shim. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Minimal README and no deps are expected for a prebuilt binary distribution package. | ai |
Versions (showing 45 of 45)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.142 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.141 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.140 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.139 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.138 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.137 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.136 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.135 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.134 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.133 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.132 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.131 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.130 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.129 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.128 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.127 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.126 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.125 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.124 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.123 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.122 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.121 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.120 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.119 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.118 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.117 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.116 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.114 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.113 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.112 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.111 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.110 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.109 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.108 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.107 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.106 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.102 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.101 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.100 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.99 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.98 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.97 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.96 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.89 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.88 | 0 / 0 |
v0.1.141
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.140
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.139
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.138
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.137
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.136
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.135
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.134
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.133
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.132
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.131
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.130
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.129
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.128
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.127
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.126
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.125
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.124
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.123
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.122
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.121
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.120
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.119
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.118
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.117
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.116
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.114
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.113
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.112
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.111
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.110
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.109
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.108
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.107
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.106
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.102
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.101
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.100
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.99
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.98
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.97
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.96
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.89
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.88
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • libopentui.so
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.