@farcaster/core
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:cors | AI (typosquat): Scoped @farcaster/core is a legitimate Farcaster protocol package, not a typosquat of cors. | ai |
Versions (showing 17 of 17)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.19.0 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.18.11 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.18.10 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.18.9 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.18.8 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.18.7 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.17.1 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.17.0 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.5 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.4 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.3 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.2 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.1 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.16.0 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.15.6 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.15.5 | 6 / 9 | |
| 0.15.4 | 6 / 9 |
v0.16.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sds) than the most recent previously approved version (sanjayprabhu) on 2025-05-07, but sds is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.16.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.16.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (caheart_mm) than the most recent previously approved version (sanjayprabhu) on 2025-04-28, but caheart_mm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.16.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sanjayprabhu) than the most recent previously approved version (aditiharini) on 2025-04-04, but sanjayprabhu is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.15.6
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (caheart_mm) than the most recent previously approved version (aditiharini) on 2024-10-28, but caheart_mm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.15.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.