@feathersjs/socketio-client
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): This is a v4.x maintenance/backport release from the canonical FeathersJS maintainer (daffl). The project is actively maintained on v5; v4 patch releases after a gap are expected and not indicative of account takeover. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/socket.io-client | AI (phantom-deps): @types/socket.io-client is a DefinitelyTyped type-declaration package used for bundled TypeScript types, not a runtime import. Phantom-dep finding is a stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@feathersjs/feathers | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package in the feathersjs monorepo; always co-published at matching versions. Not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@feathersjs/transport-commons | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package in the feathersjs monorepo; always co-published at matching versions. Not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established 3100+ day old package from the official FeathersJS project; lack of Sigstore provenance is not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 47 of 47)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0.46 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.45 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.44 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.43 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.42 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.41 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.40 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.39 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.37 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.36 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.35 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.34 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.33 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.32 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.31 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.30 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.29 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.28 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.27 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.26 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.25 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.24 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.23 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.22 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.21 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.20 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.19 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.18 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.17 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.16 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.15 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.14 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.13 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.12 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.11 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.10 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.9 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.8 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.7 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.6 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.5 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.4 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.3 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.2 | 2 / 11 | |
| 5.0.1 | 1 / 12 | |
| 5.0.0 | 1 / 12 | |
| 4.5.19 | 2 / 7 |
v5.0.46
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (daffl) than the most recent previously approved version (marshallswain) on 2026-06-27, but daffl is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v5.0.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.