@feathersjs/transport-commons
Shared functionality for websocket providers
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:radix-router | AI (dependencies): radix-router is a legitimate URL routing library; its use in @feathersjs/transport-commons for websocket routing is expected and stable across versions. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established FeathersJS monorepo package with a long history; lack of Sigstore provenance is not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 11 of 11)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0.44 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.43 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.42 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.41 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.40 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.39 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.37 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.36 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.35 | 5 / 8 | |
| 5.0.34 | 5 / 8 | |
| 4.5.19 | 5 / 8 |
v5.0.44
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.43
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.42
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.41
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.40
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.39
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.5.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.