@fiscozen/dialog
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): New publisher has strong approval track record (71/0); consistent with org maintainer rotation. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/style | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; phantom-dep heuristic unreliable for monorepo design system components. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/composables | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; stable false positive for this design system. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:dialog-polyfill | AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files per analyzer note; not a real phantom dep concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 35 of 35)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.34 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.33 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.32 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.31 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.30 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.29 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.28 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.27 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.26 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.25 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.24 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.23 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.22 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.21 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.20 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.19 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.18 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.17 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.16 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.15 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.14 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.13 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.12 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.11 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.10 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.1.9 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.8 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.7 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.6 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.5 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.4 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.3 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.2 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 20 | |
| 0.1.0 | 0 / 20 |
v0.1.23
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (alen_fiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2024-11-28, but alen_fiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.22
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (trebh) than the most recent previously approved version (alen_fiscozen) on 2024-11-19, but trebh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.21
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.14
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (alen_fiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (cbfiscozen) on 2024-10-17, but alen_fiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.13
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (alen_fiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (cbfiscozen) on 2024-09-11, but alen_fiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.12
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (cbfiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2024-09-11, but cbfiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.11
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (trebh) than the most recent previously approved version (alen_fiscozen) on 2024-08-14, but trebh is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.10
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (alen_fiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2024-08-06, but alen_fiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (alen_fiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2024-07-31, but alen_fiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.