@fiscozen/dialog
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): New publisher has strong approval track record (71/0); consistent with org maintainer rotation. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/style | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; phantom-dep heuristic unreliable for monorepo design system components. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/composables | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; stable false positive for this design system. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:dialog-polyfill | AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files per analyzer note; not a real phantom dep concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.31 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.30 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.29 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.28 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.27 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.26 | 4 / 20 | |
| 0.1.25 | 2 / 20 | |
| 0.1.24 | 2 / 20 |
v0.1.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.30
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-09. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.29
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-03. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.28
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-02. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.26
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.25
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.