@fiscozen/navbar
Design System Navbar Component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/button | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dep likely re-exported; stable FP for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@fiscozen/composables | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dep likely re-exported; stable FP for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Common for internal/org-scoped packages; not a risk signal here. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal design-system component; sparse metadata is expected for org-scoped packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3.0 | 3 / 18 | |
| 0.2.1 | 3 / 18 | |
| 0.1.11 | 3 / 18 | |
| 0.1.5 | 2 / 18 |
v0.3.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (francivago) than the most recent previously approved version (sergioterrasifiscozen) on 2026-05-27, but francivago is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.