@fiscozen/tooltip
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Internal @fiscozen design system package; provenance not configured for this org's packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0.2 | 1 / 20 | |
| 3.0.1 | 3 / 18 | |
| 3.0.0 | 3 / 18 | |
| 2.0.0 | 3 / 18 | |
| 1.0.3 | 3 / 18 | |
| 1.0.2 | 4 / 18 | |
| 1.0.1 | 0 / 22 |
v3.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.1
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sergioterrasifiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2026-03-09, but sergioterrasifiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v3.0.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sergioterrasifiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2026-03-03, but sergioterrasifiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.0.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sergioterrasifiscozen) than the most recent previously approved version (trebh) on 2026-03-02, but sergioterrasifiscozen is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.