← Home

@fluid-topics/ft-button

A generic Fluid Topics tag

51
Versions
ISC
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

antidotmike.antidotrtellier

Keywords

Lit

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): rtellier is an established publisher (18 approved, 0 rejected) within the same Fluid Topics org; transition appears legitimate. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:@fluid-topics/design-system-variables AI (dependencies): Internal org dependency in the @fluid-topics namespace; consistent across all versions of this package family. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Established Fluid Topics component library; no provenance is consistent across all their packages. ai

Versions (showing 51 of 112)

View all versions
Version Deps Published
2.1.15 7 / 0
2.1.14 7 / 0
2.1.12 7 / 0
2.1.11 7 / 0
2.1.10 7 / 0
2.1.9 7 / 0
2.1.8 7 / 0
2.1.7 7 / 0
2.1.6 7 / 0
2.1.5 7 / 0
2.1.4 7 / 0
2.1.3 7 / 0
2.1.2 7 / 0
2.1.1 7 / 0
2.1.0 7 / 0
2.0.38 8 / 0
2.0.37 8 / 0
2.0.36 8 / 0
2.0.35 8 / 0
2.0.34 8 / 0
2.0.33 8 / 0
2.0.32 8 / 0
2.0.31 8 / 0
2.0.30 8 / 0
2.0.29 8 / 0
2.0.28 8 / 0
2.0.27 8 / 0
2.0.26 8 / 0
2.0.25 8 / 0
2.0.24 8 / 0
2.0.23 8 / 0
2.0.22 8 / 0
2.0.21 8 / 0
2.0.20 8 / 0
2.0.19 8 / 0
2.0.18 8 / 0
2.0.17 8 / 0
2.0.16 8 / 0
2.0.15 8 / 0
2.0.14 8 / 0
2.0.13 8 / 0
2.0.12 8 / 0
2.0.11 8 / 0
2.0.10 8 / 0
2.0.9 8 / 0
2.0.8 8 / 0
2.0.7 8 / 0
2.0.6 8 / 0
2.0.5 8 / 0
2.0.4 8 / 0
2.0.3 8 / 0

v2.1.15

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: antidot → rtellier (on 2026-07-27, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rtellier) than the most recent previously approved version (antidot) on 2026-07-27, but rtellier is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v2.1.14

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.12

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.11

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.10

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.9

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.8

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.7

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.6

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.5

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.4

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.38

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.