@fncts/base
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Package now publishes via CI with SLSA provenance; gitHead absence is expected in this workflow. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): SLSA provenance attestation and clean publisher history make account-takeover unlikely; dormancy is benign here. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Established functional library in @fncts scope; empty CJS entry and missing metadata are a build artifact, not spam indicators. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.44 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.43 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.42 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.41 | 2 / 0 |
v0.0.44
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: 0x706b.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.0.43
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.42
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.41
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.