@fncts/express
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): SLSA provenance attestation present; gitHead absence is benign given CI/CD publish pipeline. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Established scoped package in a known monorepo; missing description is a style choice, not a risk indicator. | ai |
Versions (showing 11 of 11)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.45 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.44 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.43 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.42 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.41 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.40 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.39 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.38 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.37 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.36 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.35 | 1 / 0 |
v0.0.41
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.40
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.39
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.36
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.