@fncts/typelevel
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): SLSA provenance attestation present; gitHead absence is cosmetic given CI/CD publish chain. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Typelevel utility package in a monorepo; no description/keywords/deps is expected for this type of package. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.25 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.24 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.23 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.22 | 0 / 0 |
v0.0.25
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: 0x706b.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.0.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.