@focus-mcp/brick-review
Structured code review — analyze code quality, security, architecture patterns, compare versions.
2
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
No SLSA provenance
npm registry signatures
gitHead linked
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
samuelds
Keywords
mcpmodel-context-protocolaillmfocusbrickreviewcode-qualitysecurityarchitecturediff
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Signals reflect sparse metadata/packaging quality, not malicious behavior; no install scripts or suspicious code present. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common (~88% of npm packages); no other risk signals to amplify this. | ai |