@forwardimpact/libsyntheticprose
LLM-based prose and pathway generation for synthetic data
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New dep is same-org @forwardimpact scope, consistent with package purpose and publisher track record. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@forwardimpact/libtelemetry | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped dep; declared as a runtime dependency, phantom-dep heuristic is a false positive here. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all @forwardimpact packages in this monorepo; not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:ajv | AI (phantom-deps): ajv declared as direct dep for schema validation; phantom-dep heuristic fires due to indirect/config usage pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:yaml | AI (phantom-deps): yaml declared as direct dep; phantom-dep heuristic fires due to indirect/config usage pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:ajv-formats | AI (phantom-deps): ajv-formats declared as direct dep alongside ajv; phantom-dep heuristic fires due to indirect/config usage pattern. | ai |
Versions (showing 28 of 28)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.32 | 7 / 1 | |
| 0.1.31 | 7 / 0 | |
| 0.1.30 | 7 / 0 | |
| 0.1.29 | 7 / 0 | |
| 0.1.28 | 7 / 0 | |
| 0.1.27 | 7 / 0 | |
| 0.1.26 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.24 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.23 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.22 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.21 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.20 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.19 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.18 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.17 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.16 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.15 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.14 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.13 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.12 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.11 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.10 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.8 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.5 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.4 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.3 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.2 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.1 | 6 / 0 |
v0.1.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.