@galacean/effects-plugin-downgrade
Galacean Effects player downgrade plugin
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:yufangjun.com | AI (email-domain): Established publisher with 141 approved packages; domain risk is theoretical and no exploitation evidence exists. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Ant Group package; lack of provenance is consistent across all 157 versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 52)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.9.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.12 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.11 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.10 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.9 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.9 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.5 | 0 / 1 |
v2.9.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.11
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.10
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.9
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.9
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.4.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'yufangjun.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.