@galacean/effects-plugin-downgrade
Galacean Effects player downgrade plugin
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:yufangjun.com | AI (email-domain): Established publisher with 141 approved packages; domain risk is theoretical and no exploitation evidence exists. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Ant Group package; lack of provenance is consistent across all 157 versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 80 of 80)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.9.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.9.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.9.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.12 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.11 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.10 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.9 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.8.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.7.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.9 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.6.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.5.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.4.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.3.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.2.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.1.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.4 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.3 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 0 / 1 |
v2.9.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.