@gem-sdk/adapter-bigcommerce
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal SDK adapter in a large monorepo; missing metadata is a stable pattern across all @gem-sdk/* packages. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent with @gem-sdk/* internal adapter pattern; not indicative of malice. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 13.1.5 | 0 / 1 | |
| 13.1.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 13.0.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 11.2.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 7.0.0 | 0 / 1 |
v13.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v13.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v13.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.