@getpaseo/highlight
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent across all versions; internal scoped package pattern. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped internal package; missing metadata is a style choice, not malicious. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lezer/json | AI (dependencies): @lezer/json is a well-known CodeMirror/Lezer parser; stable false positive for this syntax-highlighting package. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.88 | 18 / 2 | |
| 0.1.87 | 16 / 2 | |
| 0.1.83 | 16 / 2 | |
| 0.1.63 | 16 / 2 |
v0.1.88
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.87
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.83
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.63
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.