@gjsify/example-dom-webgl-tutorial-01
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Publisher has 1096 approved packages; no provenance is common and not a risk here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@gjsify/webgl | AI (phantom-deps): Same org scope dependency; phantom-dep heuristic is a false positive for this example package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Example/demo package in the @gjsify org; sparse metadata is expected for tutorial examples, not spam. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Example package; missing description is cosmetic, not a risk indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 5 of 5)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.7 | 1 / 6 | |
| 0.1.6 | 1 / 6 | |
| 0.1.5 | 1 / 6 | |
| 0.1.4 | 1 / 6 | |
| 0.1.3 | 1 / 6 |
v0.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.