@gluestack-ui/overlay
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Org monorepo maintainer rotation, no compromise indicators. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Paired with new maintainer add in same org, benign handoff. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Consistent with slow-moving monorepo package cadence. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@react-native-aria/focus | AI (phantom-deps): Platform-specific dep; phantom-dep heuristic fires on React Native platform-conditional imports, stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.22 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.21 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.20 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.19 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.18 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.17 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.16 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.15 | 3 / 10 |
v0.1.21
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gluestackadmin) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-03-03, but gluestackadmin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.20
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gluestackadmin) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-02-19, but gluestackadmin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.17
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (geekgautam) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-02-18, but geekgautam is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.