@gluestack-ui/tabs
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.24 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.23 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.22 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.21 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.20 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.19 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.18 | 3 / 10 | |
| 0.1.17 | 3 / 10 |
v0.1.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.23
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gluestackadmin) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-03-03, but gluestackadmin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.22
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gluestackadmin) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-02-19, but gluestackadmin is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.21
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (madhavb230100) than the most recent previously approved version (geekgautam) on 2025-02-18, but madhavb230100 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.20
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (madhavb230100) than the most recent previously approved version (geekgautam) on 2025-02-18, but madhavb230100 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.19
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (geekgautam) than the most recent previously approved version (madhavb230100) on 2025-02-18, but geekgautam is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.1.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.