@goodchat/create
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@goodchat/core | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org workspace sibling in a monorepo; phantom-dep detection is a false positive for bundled workspace packages. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@goodchat/plugins | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org workspace sibling in a monorepo; phantom-dep detection is a false positive for bundled workspace packages. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Metadata gaps (no description, no repo, no keywords) are typical of monorepo sub-packages, not spam/malware indicators for this org-scoped package. | ai |
Versions (showing 23 of 23)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.24 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.23 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.22 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.21 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.20 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.19 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.18 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.17 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.16 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.15 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.14 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.13 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.12 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.11 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.10 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.9 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.8 | 2 / 6 | |
| 0.0.7 | 1 / 7 | |
| 0.0.6 | 1 / 8 | |
| 0.0.5 | 1 / 8 | |
| 0.0.4 | 1 / 8 | |
| 0.0.2 | 1 / 8 | |
| 0.0.1 | 4 / 5 |
v0.0.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.21
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.