@gooddata/code-cli
GoodData CLI
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:rodri360.com | AI (email-domain): Org-level publisher with strong track record; unclaimed personal email domain is low risk here. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Consistent with normal team rotation at established GoodData org. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:esm/index.js | AI (source-diff): rolldown-bundled CLI output; long lines are build artifact, not obfuscation. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:esm/index.js | AI (source-diff): Bundled CLI legitimately uses http/https and child_process; no exfil destination identified. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/index.js | AI (source-diff): Rolldown-bundled CLI output; rolldown runtime banner visible, no true obfuscation patterns present. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:dist/index.js | AI (source-diff): CLI tool legitimately uses network and child_process; bundled single-file distribution is expected for this package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): CLI tool with bundled deps and proprietary license; no-repo and no-deps signals are expected for this package type. | ai |
Versions (showing 29 of 29)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.44.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.43.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.42.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.41.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.40.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.39.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.38.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.37.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.36.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.35.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.34.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.33.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.32.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.31.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.30.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.28.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.27.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.26.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.25.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.24.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.23.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.22.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.22.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.21.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.21.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.20.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.19.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.18.0 | 0 / 0 |
v0.45.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.44.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.43.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.42.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.41.0
4 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Maintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.40.0
4 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Maintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.28.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.23.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.22.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.22.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gooddata-ci) than the most recent previously approved version (good-andy) on 2026-01-09, but gooddata-ci is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.21.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.21.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.20.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.19.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.18.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.