@gooddata/eslint-config
Unified, modular ESLint configuration for the GoodData.UI monorepo.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established GoodData CI pipeline; no provenance is consistent across all 332 versions. | ai | |
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:rodri360.com | AI (email-domain): Stale maintainer contact email; package published by gooddata-ci CI account with long track record, not this email. | ai |
Versions (showing 38 of 38)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 11.40.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.39.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.38.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.37.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.36.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.35.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.34.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.33.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.32.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.31.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.30.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.29.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.28.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.27.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.26.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.25.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.24.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.23.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.22.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.21.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.20.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.19.0 | 0 / 30 | |
| 11.18.0 | 0 / 29 | |
| 11.17.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.16.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.15.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.14.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.13.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.12.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.11.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.10.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.9.0 | 0 / 28 | |
| 11.8.0 | 0 / 26 | |
| 11.7.1 | 0 / 26 | |
| 11.7.0 | 0 / 26 | |
| 11.6.0 | 0 / 26 | |
| 11.5.0 | 0 / 26 | |
| 11.4.0 | 0 / 26 |
v11.40.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.39.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.38.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.37.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.36.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.35.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.34.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.33.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.30.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.29.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.28.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.27.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.26.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.25.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.24.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.23.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.22.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.21.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.20.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.19.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.18.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.17.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.16.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.15.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.14.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.13.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.12.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.11.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.10.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.9.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.8.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.7.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.7.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.6.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.5.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.4.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rodri360.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.