@harmoniclabs/plutus-machine
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established publisher with consistent track record; no provenance is normal for this org's packages. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Established package with clear purpose; empty description is a cosmetic issue, not a risk signal. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0.3 | 7 / 7 | |
| 3.0.2 | 7 / 7 | |
| 3.0.1 | 7 / 7 | |
| 3.0.0 | 7 / 7 | |
| 2.1.3 | 5 / 7 | |
| 2.1.2 | 5 / 7 |
v3.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.