@indra.ai/deva.military
Military Deva manages Military Framework
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Small ecosystem package; no provenance is consistent across all versions from this publisher. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:VLA:14491445251698762242 LICENSE.md | AI (license): Custom license is a stable characteristic of this publisher's packages; not a security concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 19 of 19)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.5.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.4.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.3.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.8 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.7 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.1 | 1 / 0 |
v0.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.