@internetarchive/ia-activity-indicator
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Absence of Sigstore provenance is common (~88% of packages); no other risk signals make this meaningful for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 1 / 30 | |
| 0.0.6 | 1 / 30 | |
| 0.0.5 | 1 / 10 | |
| 0.0.4 | 1 / 10 | |
| 0.0.3 | 1 / 10 | |
| 0.0.2 | 1 / 10 |
v0.0.5
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (iisa) than the most recent previously approved version (nsharma123) on 2023-05-23, but iisa is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.0.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account (latonv) than the most recent previously approved version (nsharma123) on 2023-03-06. It has since remained available on npm for 1232 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.