@intility/bifrost-css
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from human publisher to GitHub Actions CI is a legitimate automation pattern for this org package. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Established package with clear homepage and keywords; empty description is a cosmetic issue, not a risk signal. | ai |
Versions (showing 28 of 28)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 6.10.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.9.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.8.3 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.8.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.8.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.8.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.7.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.7.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.7.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.6.3 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.6.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.6.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.6.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.5.4 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.5.3 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.5.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.5.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.5.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.4.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.4.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.3.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.3.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.3.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.2.2 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.2.1 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.2.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.1.0 | 0 / 9 | |
| 6.0.0 | 0 / 9 |
v6.10.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.8.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.8.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.8.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.7.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v6.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v6.4.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-10-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.3.2
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-10-14. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.3.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-10-08. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.3.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-10-08. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.2.2
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-10-06. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.2.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-09-30. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.2.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-09-19. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.