@ionic/utils-terminal
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Ionic org maintainer reshuffle; publisher matched known maintainer, no behavioral change. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Routine maintainer list update for established Ionic package. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Stable utility package with no code changes; dormancy expected. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:tslib | AI (phantom-deps): Known implicit runtime dependency, not a real issue. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/slice-ansi | AI (phantom-deps): @types/slice-ansi is intentionally listed as a runtime dep (not devDep) in this package — a packaging quirk, not a security issue. Stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Ionic CLI monorepo sub-package; short README and no keywords are expected for internal utility packages. Not a spam or low-value package. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 16)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.5 | 9 / 11 | |
| 2.3.4 | 9 / 11 | |
| 2.3.3 | 9 / 11 | |
| 2.3.2 | 8 / 12 | |
| 2.3.1 | 8 / 10 | |
| 2.3.0 | 7 / 9 | |
| 2.2.1 | 2 / 9 | |
| 2.2.0 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.1.4 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.1.3 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.1.2 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.1.1 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.1.0 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 10 | |
| 2.0.0 | 2 / 10 |
v2.3.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2023-03-29, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.3.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2022-06-16, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.3.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2022-05-09, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.3.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2020-09-29, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.3.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2020-09-24, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.2.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2020-08-28, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.2.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2020-08-27, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ionicjs) than the most recent previously approved version (dwieeb) on 2020-08-25, but ionicjs is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (dwieeb) than the most recent previously approved version (ionicjs) on 2020-03-03, but dwieeb is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.