@jitl/quickjs-wasmfile-release-asyncify
Variant of quickjs library: Variant with separate .WASM file. Supports browser ESM, NodeJS ESM, and NodeJS CommonJS.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): WASM is the package's core deliverable; stable across versions. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established package from a known author with a clear GitHub repo; lack of Sigstore provenance is not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 11 of 11)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.31.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.30.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.29.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.29.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.29.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.28.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.27.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.26.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.25.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.25.0 | 1 / 0 |
v0.31.0
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • dist/emscripten-module.wasm
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.30.0
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • dist/emscripten-module.wasm
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.29.2
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • dist/emscripten-module.wasm
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.29.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.29.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.28.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.27.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.26.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.25.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.25.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.