@kb-labs/plugin-execution
Universal execution layer for KB Labs plugins
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@kb-labs/core-ipc | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo pattern; same-org scoped deps are commonly re-exported or transitively used. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@kb-labs/core-runtime | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo pattern; same-org scoped deps are commonly re-exported or transitively used. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@kb-labs/core-contracts | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo pattern; same-org scoped deps are commonly re-exported or transitively used. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@kb-labs/plugin-runtime | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo pattern; same-org scoped deps are commonly re-exported or transitively used. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Package has no provenance attestation but is otherwise clean; no malicious signals present. | ai |
Versions (showing 39 of 39)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.93.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.89.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.87.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.81.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.79.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.76.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.73.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.72.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.69.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.68.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.64.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.61.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.55.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.45.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.43.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.40.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.37.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.34.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.33.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.32.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.31.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.20.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.18.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.17.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.16.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.15.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.14.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.13.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.12.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.11.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.10.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.9.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 2.6.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 1.4.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 1.3.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 1.2.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 1.1.0 | 4 / 9 | |
| 1.0.0 | 7 / 9 |
v2.94.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.93.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.89.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.87.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.81.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.79.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.76.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.73.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.72.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.69.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.68.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.64.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.61.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.55.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.45.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.43.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.40.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.37.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.34.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.33.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.32.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.31.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.20.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.18.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.17.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.16.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.15.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.14.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.13.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.12.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.11.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.10.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.