@kb-labs/quality-contracts
Type-safe contracts for Quality Plugin. Types, schemas, and constants for monorepo analysis and quality checks.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Low-risk contracts/types package; provenance absence alone is not disqualifying here. | ai |
Versions (showing 26 of 26)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.93.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.89.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.77.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.74.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.65.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.61.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.60.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.47.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.45.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.40.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.39.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.37.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.34.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.30.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.25.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.23.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.18.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.17.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.14.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.13.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.12.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.10.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.9.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 2.6.0 | 1 / 7 | |
| 0.6.0 | 1 / 7 |
v2.94.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.93.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.89.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.77.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.74.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.65.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.61.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.60.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.47.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.45.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.40.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.39.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.37.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.34.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.30.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.25.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.23.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.18.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.17.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.14.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.13.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.12.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.10.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: k.baranov.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.