@keplr-wallet/cosmos
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Scoped package from established org; missing description is common for internal library components. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Provenance attestation is rare (~12% adoption); not a signal for this established publisher. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:protobufjs | AI (dependencies): protobufjs is a well-known, widely-used protobuf library; its use is expected and appropriate for a Cosmos blockchain client package handling protobuf serialization. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@keplr-wallet/common | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped dependency in a monorepo; phantom import detection is unreliable for monorepo packages where usage may be indirect or in build artifacts. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Keplr wallet migrated to GitHub Actions CI/CD publishing with SLSA provenance attestation; the publisher change reflects legitimate automation, not a compromise. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Missing metadata (description, repo, keywords) is typical for monorepo sub-packages; publisher chainapsis has 3057 approved packages and zero rejections. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:base64-decode | AI (semgrep): Base64 decoding in this package is used for ADR-36 amino message validation in the Cosmos wallet context — standard cryptographic handling, not a malicious payload indicator. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:long | AI (phantom-deps): 'long' is a standard dependency used alongside protobufjs for 64-bit integer handling; its indirect usage pattern is expected in protobuf-based packages. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:hex-decode | AI (semgrep): Hex decoding appears in a test spec file as a hardcoded Cosmos transaction fixture. This is normal test data for a Cosmos library, not obfuscated malicious code. | ai |
Versions (showing 100 of 475)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12.40 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.39 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.38 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.37 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.36 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.35 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.34 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.33 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.32 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.31 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.30 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.29 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.28 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.27 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.26 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.25 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.24 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.23 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.22 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.21 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.20 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.19 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.18 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.17 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.16 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.15 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.14 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.13 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.12 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.11 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.10 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.9 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.8 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.7 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.6 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.5 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.4 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.3 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.2 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.1 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.12.0 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.64 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.63 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.62 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.61 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.60 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.59 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.58 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.57 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.56 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.55 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.53 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.52 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.51 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.50 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.49 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.48 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.47 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.46 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.45 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.44 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.43 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.42 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.41 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.40 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.39 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.38 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.37 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.36 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.35 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.34 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.33 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.32 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.31 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.30 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.29 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.28 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.27 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.26 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.25 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.24 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.23 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.22 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.21 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.20 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.19 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.18 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.17 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.16 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.15 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.14 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.13 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.12 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.11 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.10 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.9 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.8 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.7 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.6 | 11 / 0 | |
| 0.11.4 | 11 / 0 |
v0.12.40
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.39
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.64
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.63
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.62
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.61
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.60
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.59
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.58
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.57
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.56
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.55
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.53
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.52
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.51
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.50
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.49
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.48
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.47
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.46
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.45
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.44
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.43
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.42
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.41
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.40
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.39
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.