@keystonehq/bc-ur-registry-eth
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:bip32 | AI (phantom-deps): Standard HD-wallet lib used by Keystone crypto registry; likely used in TS source not scanned. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:bs58check | AI (phantom-deps): Base58check encoding used by wallet address logic; false positive on scan. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:ethereumjs-tx | AI (phantom-deps): ETH transaction lib fitting package purpose; false positive on scan. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:hex-decode | AI (semgrep): Hex decoding of xfp (extended fingerprint) is standard UR registry parsing; not a malicious payload pattern. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 56)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.22.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.22.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.21.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.20.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.20.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.19.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.19.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.18.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.18.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.17.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.16.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.15.2 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.15.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.15.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.6 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.5 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.4 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.3 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.2 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.14.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.13.0 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.12.1 | 4 / 10 | |
| 0.12.0 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.11.4 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.11.3 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.11.2 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.11.1 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.11.0 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.10.0 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.9.1 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.9.0 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.7.7 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.6 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.5 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.4 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.3 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.2 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.1 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.0 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.6.14 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.6.13 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.6.12 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.6.11 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.6.10 | 6 / 2 | |
| 0.6.9 | 4 / 2 | |
| 0.6.8 | 4 / 2 | |
| 0.6.7 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.6.5 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.6.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.5.5 | 4 / 1 |
v0.21.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (keystoneorg) than the most recent previously approved version (liyanlance) on 2024-09-03, but keystoneorg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.20.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.20.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.19.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.19.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (soralit) than the most recent previously approved version (amalia20220301) on 2023-05-30, but soralit is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.18.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (soralit) than the most recent previously approved version (amalia20220301) on 2023-05-31, but soralit is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.18.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.17.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (amalia20220301) than the most recent previously approved version (soralit) on 2023-04-25, but amalia20220301 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.15.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.15.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.15.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (soralit) than the most recent previously approved version (yu_keyst) on 2022-12-29, but soralit is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.13.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account (yu_keyst) than the most recent previously approved version (soralit) on 2022-11-01. It has since remained available on npm for 1359 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (soralit) than the most recent previously approved version (amalia20220301) on 2022-09-19, but soralit is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.4
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (amalia20220301) than the most recent previously approved version (soralit) on 2022-06-20, but amalia20220301 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.11.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.7
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (soralit) than the most recent previously approved version (keystoneorg) on 2021-08-11, but soralit is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.6.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.3
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (keystoneorg) than the most recent previously approved version (soralit) on 2021-08-04, but keystoneorg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.5.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (keystoneorg) than the most recent previously approved version (soralit) on 2021-08-03, but keystoneorg is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.