@kodiak-finance/orderly-default-solana-adapter
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@kodiak-finance/orderly-core | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @kodiak-finance monorepo; unvetted status reflects pipeline lag, not a security concern. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Scoped org package with consistent versioning; empty description is a style choice, not a malware indicator. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common across this org's 98 published versions; not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 29 of 29)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9.3 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.9.2 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.9.1 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.9.0 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.33 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.32 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.31 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.30 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.29 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.28 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.27 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.26 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.25 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.24 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.23 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.22 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.21 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.20 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.19 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.18 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.17 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.16 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.15 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.11 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.10 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.9 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.8 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.8.7 | 12 / 4 | |
| 2.7.4 | 12 / 4 |
v2.9.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.