@kopexa/select
a select component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@base-ui-components/react | AI (dependencies): @base-ui-components/react is MUI's Base UI library; legitimate well-known dependency, stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Kopexa packages consistently lack provenance attestation; not a risk indicator for this org. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 27)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 17.2.55 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.54 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.53 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.52 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.50 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.49 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.48 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.47 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.46 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.45 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.44 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.43 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.42 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.41 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.40 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.39 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.38 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.37 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.2.36 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.1.4 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.1.3 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.1.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.1.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.1.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.0.6 | 4 / 0 | |
| 17.0.5 | 4 / 0 | |
| 14.0.4 | 4 / 0 |
v17.2.55
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.54
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.53
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.52
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.50
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.49
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.48
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.47
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v17.2.46
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.45
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.44
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.43
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.42
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.41
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.40
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.39
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.2.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v17.2.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v17.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v17.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v17.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v17.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v14.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.