@kosdev-code/kos-ddk-models
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped internal SDK package under @kosdev-code org; missing metadata (description, repo, keywords) is typical for internal packages, not indicative of spam or malice. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Internal organizational SDK package; missing description is a hygiene issue, not a security signal for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common (~88% of npm packages); no other signals suggest tampering for this established package. | ai |
Versions (showing 19 of 19)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 3.0.4 | 3 / 0 | |
| 3.0.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 3.0.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 3.0.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 3.0.0 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.1.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.1.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.1.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.1.0 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.11 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.10 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.9 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.8 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.4 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 2.0.1 | 3 / 0 |
v3.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.