@kosmojs/fetch-generator
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@kosmojs/api | AI (dependencies): Internal sibling package within the @kosmojs namespace; consistent pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@kosmojs/dev | AI (dependencies): Internal sibling package within the @kosmojs namespace; consistent pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@kosmojs/devlib | AI (dependencies): Same-org scoped dependency (@kosmojs/*) from the same publisher; consistent across versions. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | suspicious-initial-version | AI (npm-metadata): @kosmojs namespace uses 0.0.0 versioning across all packages; stable pattern for this publisher. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal scoped package; missing metadata is consistent across the @kosmojs family, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common; no other risk signals present for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 28 of 28)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.8 | 2 / 10 | |
| 0.1.7 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.1.6 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.1.2 | 0 / 11 | |
| 0.1.0 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.30 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.29 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.28 | 1 / 10 | |
| 0.0.27 | 1 / 9 | |
| 0.0.26 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.25 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.24 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.23 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.22 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.0.21 | 1 / 10 | |
| 0.0.20 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.11 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.10 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.9 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.8 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.7 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.6 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.5 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.4 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.3 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.0 | 1 / 1 |
v0.1.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.