@lage-run/scheduler
Scheduler for Lage
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Package migrated to GitHub Actions publishing with SLSA attestation; legitimate CI/CD transition for Microsoft/lage monorepo. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/config | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/hasher | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/logger | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/cache | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/target-graph | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/worker-threads-pool | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lage-run/runners | AI (dependencies): First-party sibling package from the same Microsoft lage monorepo; consistent namespace and SLSA provenance on parent package mitigates risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 63 of 63)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6.12 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.11 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.10 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.9 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.8 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.7 | 8 / 3 | |
| 1.6.6 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.5 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.4 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.3 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.2 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.1 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.6.0 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.5.23 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.5.22 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.5.21 | 7 / 3 | |
| 1.5.20 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.19 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.18 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.17 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.16 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.15 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.14 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.13 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.12 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.11 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.10 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.9 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.8 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.7 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.6 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.5 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.4 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.3 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.2 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.5.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.5 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.4 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.3 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.2 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.4.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.12 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.11 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.10 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.9 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.8 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.7 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.6 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.5 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.4 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.3 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.2 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.3.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.14 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.13 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.12 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.11 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.10 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.9 | 7 / 2 | |
| 1.2.8 | 7 / 2 |
v1.6.12
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.6.11
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.5.5
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ecraig12345_msft) than the most recent previously approved version (kenotron_msft) on 2025-04-17, but ecraig12345_msft is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.5.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.