@lexical/plain-text
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): Added deps are first-party @lexical/* siblings at matching version. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:LexicalPlainText.prod.mjs | AI (source-diff): Minified prod build of official Lexical package, not obfuscation. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Legitimate migration to GitHub Actions CI/CD publishing with SLSA provenance for facebook/lexical. | ai | |
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Expected side-effect of switching to GitHub Actions publish flow; SLSA attestation compensates. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/LexicalPlainText.prod.mjs | AI (source-diff): Standard minified production ESM bundle for this Meta/Facebook package. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/LexicalPlainText.prod.js | AI (source-diff): Standard minified production bundle for this Meta/Facebook package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): @lexical/plain-text is a Facebook/Meta Lexical ecosystem package; lack of Sigstore provenance is a process gap, not a security risk for this well-established package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lexical/utils | AI (dependencies): Sibling package from the same facebook/lexical monorepo, always released at the same version. Not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lexical/clipboard | AI (dependencies): Sibling package from the same facebook/lexical monorepo, always released at the same version. Not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lexical/dragon | AI (dependencies): Sibling package from the same facebook/lexical monorepo, always released at the same version. Not a third-party risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 118)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.47.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.46.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.45.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.44.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.43.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.42.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.41.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.40.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.39.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.38.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.38.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.38.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.37.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.36.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.36.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.36.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.35.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.34.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.33.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.33.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.32.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.32.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.31.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.31.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.31.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.30.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.29.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.28.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.27.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.27.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.27.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.26.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.25.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.24.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.23.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.23.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.22.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.21.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.20.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.20.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.20.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.19.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.18.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.17.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.17.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.16.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.16.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.15.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.14.5 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.14.4 | 4 / 0 |
v0.48.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.47.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.41.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: zurfyx.
v0.40.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: zurfyx.
v0.30.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.29.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.28.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.27.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.27.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.27.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.26.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.25.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (zurfyx) than the most recent previously approved version (acywatson) on 2025-02-21, but zurfyx is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.24.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (zurfyx) than the most recent previously approved version (acywatson) on 2025-02-07, but zurfyx is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.23.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.23.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.22.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.21.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.20.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.20.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.20.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.19.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.18.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.17.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.17.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.14.5
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.4
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.