@lexical/yjs
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): lexical is the first-party sibling package at matching version; core to stated function. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:LexicalYjs.prod.mjs | AI (source-diff): Minified prod ESM build output with Meta license banner; expected for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from manual publish (zurfyx) to GitHub Actions CI/CD with SLSA attestation; expected for facebook/lexical. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/LexicalYjs.prod.mjs | AI (source-diff): Standard minified production ESM bundle for this Meta/Facebook package. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/LexicalYjs.prod.js | AI (source-diff): Standard minified production bundle for this Meta/Facebook package. | ai | |
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Well-established Facebook/Lexical monorepo package; missing gitHead likely reflects a CI/CD environment change, not a supply chain compromise. No other risk signals present. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Facebook/Meta Lexical package; lack of Sigstore provenance is a process gap, not a security indicator for this well-known package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:dayjs | AI (typosquat): @lexical/yjs is a legitimate Facebook/Meta Lexical editor package; Levenshtein match to dayjs is a false positive for this scoped package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lexical/selection | AI (dependencies): @lexical/selection is a sibling package in the same Facebook/Meta Lexical monorepo, pinned to the same version. Expected internal dependency. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@lexical/offset | AI (dependencies): @lexical/offset is a sibling package in the same Facebook/Meta Lexical monorepo, pinned to the same version. Expected internal dependency. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:ajv | AI (typosquat): @lexical/yjs is a legitimate Facebook/Meta Lexical editor package; Levenshtein match to ajv is a false positive for this scoped package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:yup | AI (typosquat): @lexical/yjs is a legitimate Facebook/Meta Lexical editor package; Levenshtein match to yup is a false positive for this scoped package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:rxjs | AI (typosquat): @lexical/yjs is a legitimate Facebook/Meta Lexical editor package; Levenshtein match to rxjs is a false positive for this scoped package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:qs | AI (typosquat): @lexical/yjs is a legitimate Facebook/Meta Lexical editor package; Levenshtein match to qs is a false positive for this scoped package. | ai |
Versions (showing 36 of 136)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.3.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.3.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.3.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.9 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.8 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.7 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.21 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.20 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.19 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.18 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.17 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.16 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.15 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.14 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.3 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.1.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.1.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.1.0 | 2 / 0 |
v0.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.