@llui/vike
LLui Vike SSR adapter — onRenderHtml, onRenderClient hooks
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Young package without CI provenance setup; not a security risk on its own. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:jsdom | AI (phantom-deps): jsdom is a declared runtime dep for SSR; phantom-dep heuristic fires because it's not directly imported in source. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:vite | AI (typosquat): @llui/vike is a Vike SSR adapter for the @llui framework, not a typosquat of vite. | ai |
Versions (showing 29 of 29)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.8.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.7.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.6.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.5.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.5.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.4.10 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.4.9 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.4.8 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.4.7 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.4.6 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.0.36 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.0.18 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.17 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.16 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.15 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.14 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.13 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.5 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 0.0.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.1 | 1 / 0 |
v0.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.36
2 findingsPackage name '@llui/vike' is 1 edit(s) away from popular package 'vite'.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.