@lm_fe/pages
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/a_chunks/src.pages.questionnaire.js | AI (source-diff): Rollup bundle output with long CSS lines; not obfuscation. Stable for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:history | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced dependency; stable pattern for internal monorepo packages. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:braft-editor | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced dependency; stable pattern for internal monorepo packages. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:qrcode.react | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced dependency; stable pattern for internal monorepo packages. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal monorepo package; missing metadata (repo, description, keywords) is expected and not indicative of malice. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@lm_fe/scripts | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; declared as runtime dep in package.json, phantom detection is a false positive here. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.12 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.11 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.10 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.8 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.7 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.6 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.5 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.2.2 | 8 / 3 | |
| 0.1.211 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.210 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.209 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.207 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.206 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.205 | 13 / 1 | |
| 0.1.201 | 13 / 1 |
v0.2.11
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.8
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.7
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.6
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.211
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.210
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.209
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.207
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.206
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.205
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.201
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.