@medusajs/analytics
Medusa Analytics module
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Large established monorepo; provenance not historically enabled for this package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Medusa monorepo module; sparse README and no keywords are expected for internal framework packages. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Medusajs migrated to GitHub Actions CI/CD publishing with SLSA provenance; publisher change is expected and verified. | ai |
Versions (showing 39 of 39)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.16.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.15.5 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.15.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.15.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.15.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.15.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.14.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.14.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.14.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.5 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.4 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.13.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.6 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.5 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.4 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.12.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.11.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.11.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.11.1 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.11.0 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.10.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.10.1 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.10.0 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.9.0 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.8 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.7 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.6 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.5 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.4 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.3 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.8.2 | 0 / 8 |
v2.18.0
2 findingsThis version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. Multiple high-profile registry compromises have exhibited exactly this pattern.
This version was published by a different npm account (olijuhl) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on unknown date, but olijuhl is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.