← Home

@medusajs/cache-inmemory

In-memory Cache Module for Medusa

51
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

sebrindomoliverjuhlnicolas-gorgasradevskiolijuhl

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): Medusa monorepo publisher rotation; benign and recurring across packages. ai
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Large monorepo package; likely CI pipeline change, no code changes detected vs prior version. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Large Medusa monorepo package; provenance attestation not historically enabled for this package family. ai
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Medusa migrated to GitHub Actions CI publishing; SLSA attestation confirms legitimate pipeline origin. ai

Versions (showing 51 of 66)

View all versions
Version Deps Published
2.18.0 0 / 1
2.17.1 0 / 1
2.17.0 0 / 1
2.16.0 0 / 1
2.15.5 0 / 1
2.15.3 0 / 1
2.15.2 0 / 1
2.15.1 0 / 1
2.15.0 0 / 1
2.14.2 0 / 1
2.14.1 0 / 1
2.14.0 0 / 1
2.13.6 0 / 1
2.13.5 0 / 1
2.13.4 0 / 1
2.13.3 0 / 1
2.13.2 0 / 1
2.13.1 0 / 1
2.13.0 0 / 1
2.12.6 0 / 1
2.12.5 0 / 1
2.12.4 0 / 1
2.12.3 0 / 1
2.12.2 0 / 1
2.12.1 0 / 1
2.12.0 0 / 1
2.11.3 0 / 1
2.11.2 0 / 6
2.11.1 0 / 6
2.11.0 0 / 6
2.10.3 0 / 6
2.10.2 0 / 6
2.10.1 0 / 6
2.10.0 0 / 6
2.9.0 0 / 6
2.8.8 0 / 6
2.8.7 0 / 6
2.8.6 0 / 6
2.8.5 0 / 6
2.8.4 0 / 6
2.8.3 0 / 6
2.8.2 0 / 6
2.8.1 0 / 6
2.8.0 0 / 6
2.7.1 0 / 6
2.7.0 0 / 6
2.6.1 0 / 6
2.6.0 0 / 6
2.5.1 0 / 6
2.5.0 0 / 6
2.4.0 0 / 6

v2.18.0

1 finding
HIGH Provenance attestation missing — previous versions had it provenance

This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. Multiple high-profile registry compromises have exhibited exactly this pattern.

v2.7.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.7.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.6.1

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: oliverjuhl → owjuhl (on 2025-03-10, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (owjuhl) than the most recent previously approved version (oliverjuhl) on 2025-03-10, but owjuhl is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v2.6.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.5.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.5.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.4.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.