@medusajs/http-types-generator
Generate and validate HTTP TypeScript types
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Addition alongside known-maintainer manual publish; no other risk signal. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from human publisher to GitHub Actions CI with SLSA provenance; consistent with medusajs monorepo CI publishing migration. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18.0 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.17.0 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.16.0 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.15.5 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.15.3 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.15.2 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.15.1 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.15.0 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.14.2 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.14.1 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.14.0 | 6 / 2 | |
| 2.13.6 | 6 / 2 |
v2.18.0
2 findingsThis version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. Multiple high-profile registry compromises have exhibited exactly this pattern.
This version was published by a different npm account (olijuhl) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-07-23, but olijuhl is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.