@medusajs/telemetry
Telemetry for Medusa
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:global | AI (phantom-deps): Declared dependency used by convention in this telemetry package; stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@babel/runtime | AI (phantom-deps): @babel/runtime is a runtime helper loaded by convention in transpiled packages; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| install-scripts | install-script:postinstall | AI (install-scripts): Medusa telemetry has historically used postinstall for opt-in telemetry setup; the script itself is benign in context of legitimate releases. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 27)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18.0 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.16.0 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.15.2 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.15.1 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.15.0 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.14.2 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.14.0 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.13.6 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.13.5 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.13.2 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.13.0 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.12.5 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.12.2 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.12.1 | 9 / 0 | |
| 2.11.1 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.11.0 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.10.3 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.10.2 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.10.1 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.10.0 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.8 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.7 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.5 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.3 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.2 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.1 | 10 / 5 | |
| 2.8.0 | 10 / 5 |
v2.18.0
2 findingsThis version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. Multiple high-profile registry compromises have exhibited exactly this pattern.
This version was published by a different npm account (olijuhl) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on unknown date, but olijuhl is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.