← Home

@meistrari/vault-sdk

16
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

0xthierryrjmunhozamorim33henrykunhrodrigo_lgczaghiianfiremanmatheusvellonethullyocunharenanllm

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed-known-maintainer AI (provenance): rjmunhoz is a listed maintainer; manual publish by known maintainer is expected for this package. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:zod AI (phantom-deps): zod is a declared runtime dependency; phantom-dep heuristic misfires for this package. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:ofetch AI (phantom-deps): ofetch is a declared runtime dependency; phantom-dep false positive for this package. ai

Versions (showing 16 of 16)

Version Deps Published
3.4.2 3 / 5
3.4.1 5 / 5
3.4.0 5 / 5
3.3.0 5 / 5
3.2.1 5 / 5
3.2.0 5 / 5
3.1.1 5 / 5
3.1.0 5 / 5
3.0.0 5 / 5
2.0.2 5 / 5
2.0.1 5 / 5
2.0.0 5 / 5
1.9.0 5 / 5
1.8.3 5 / 5
1.8.2 5 / 5
1.8.1 5 / 5

v3.4.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.4.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.4.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.3.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v3.2.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.1.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.1.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.2

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: rjmunhoz.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: GitHub Actions → rjmunhoz (on 2026-01-23, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rjmunhoz) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-01-23, but rjmunhoz is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v2.0.1

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: GitHub Actions → rjmunhoz (on 2026-01-23, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (rjmunhoz) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-01-23, but rjmunhoz is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v2.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.9.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.8.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.8.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.8.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.