← Home

@microsoft/teams.cards

13
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

microsoft1esmicrosoft-oss-releasescorinagumaaceboaamirjawaid

Keywords

microsoftteamsmsteamscopilotaiadaptive-cards

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Publisher changed to microsoft1es, a well-established Microsoft automation account with 3646 approved packages. Consistent with internal Microsoft CI/CD consolidation. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): microsoft-oss-releases is Microsoft's OSS release automation infrastructure; addition is consistent with the publisher transition to microsoft1es. ai
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Missing gitHead reflects a CI/CD pipeline change accompanying the publisher transition; no content changes in the version diff support this being benign. ai

Versions (showing 13 of 13)

Version Deps Published
2.0.12 0 / 7
2.0.11 0 / 7
2.0.10 0 / 7
2.0.9 0 / 7
2.0.8 0 / 7
2.0.7 0 / 7
2.0.6 0 / 7
2.0.5 0 / 7
2.0.4 0 / 7
2.0.3 0 / 7
2.0.2 0 / 7
2.0.1 0 / 7
2.0.0 0 / 7

v2.0.12

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.11

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.10

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: microsoft1es.

v2.0.9

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: microsoft1es.

v2.0.8

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.7

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.4

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.