@mintlify/common
Commonly shared code within Mintlify
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New deps are canonical remark/rehype ecosystem packages consistent with existing unified stack; no malicious signal. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:color-blend | AI (dependencies): color-blend is a legitimate color manipulation utility; appropriate for a UI/documentation library. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@types/mdast | AI (dependencies): Type definitions package from DefinitelyTyped; no runtime risk, appropriate for a markdown processing library. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@mintlify/mdx | AI (dependencies): First-party Mintlify package; same organization as this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@asyncapi/specs | AI (dependencies): Official AsyncAPI specification package from the AsyncAPI Initiative; legitimate for API documentation tooling. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@asyncapi/parser | AI (dependencies): Official AsyncAPI parser from the AsyncAPI Initiative; legitimate for API documentation tooling. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@mintlify/models | AI (dependencies): First-party Mintlify package; same organization as this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:hex-rgb | AI (dependencies): hex-rgb is a well-known, single-purpose utility package by sindresorhus ecosystem; legitimate dependency for color processing. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@mintlify/openapi-parser | AI (dependencies): First-party Mintlify package; same organization as this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/mdast | AI (phantom-deps): Type-only package; framework-scoped usage is expected for TypeScript projects using mdast types. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@asyncapi/specs | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced usage is expected for AsyncAPI spec validation; not a direct import pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:hast-util-to-text | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced in a markdown/MDX processing library; indirect usage pattern is legitimate. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:micromark-extension-mdx-jsx | AI (phantom-deps): Config-referenced in a markdown/MDX processing library; indirect usage pattern is legitimate. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established package with 858 versions and 230k weekly downloads; lack of provenance is common and not a risk indicator here. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@mintlify/validation | AI (dependencies): First-party Mintlify package; same organization as this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 428)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.386 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.385 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.384 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.383 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.382 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.381 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.380 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.379 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.378 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.377 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.376 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.375 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.374 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.373 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.372 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.371 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.370 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.369 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.368 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.367 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.366 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.365 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.364 | 36 / 16 | |
| 1.0.363 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.362 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.361 | 35 / 16 | |
| 1.0.360 | 35 / 16 |
v1.0.386
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.385
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.384
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.383
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.382
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.381
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.380
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.379
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.378
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.377
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.376
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.375
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.374
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.373
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.372
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.371
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.370
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.369
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.368
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.367
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.366
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.365
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.364
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.363
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.362
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.361
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.360
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.